Effect of Placing the Implant Crown on the Implant on the Same Day as the Implant vs. 4 Weeks Later.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Immediate Loading, Early Loading.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Lower Molar Requiring Extraction. Basic parameters: from 20 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Switzerland
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Influence of the Implant Loading Protocol on Implant Survival in Early Placed Single-tooth Implants in Mandibular First Molar Sites Using Computer-assisted Implant Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).
Overview
In this study, participants with one lower first molar that require removal and replacement using dental implants will be enrolled. The implant will be inserted 12-16 weeks after tooth extraction and restored either immediately with an artificial tooth (fixed implant crown) in 50% of the cases or 4 weeks later in the remainder 50%. Immediate and early loading will be compared and the investigators expect no difference in terms of implant success and health of the tissue around the implant.
Detailed description
Background
Dental implants placed between 12 and 16 weeks after tooth loss are a well-documented treatment option. Placing the artificial tooth (implant crown) on the implant the same day (immediate loading) or approximately 4 weeks after implant placement (early loading) are also treatment options with good scientific documentation. Computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) and modern implant materials/surfaces increase treatment predictability and success in this context.
Clinical relevance
The timing of implant placement post-extraction and subsequent implant loading cannot be separated in modern implant therapy any longer. At the "Sixth ITI Consensus Conference" in Amsterdam, it was concluded that the clinical evidence and documentation of early implant placement combined with immediate or early implant loading in partially edentulous patients is currently insufficiently documented. However, this treatment protocol seems to be widely applied in daily practice. The planned study is designed to provide evidence for the application of early implant placement with partial bone-healing and either an immediate or an early loading protocol.
Hypothesis/Specific aims
H0: "Early placed single tooth implants by means of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) in mandibular first molar sites with immediately loaded provisionals, show a survival rate comparable to early placed implants with an early loading protocol." Secondary parameters to be evaluated will be the prosthetic survival/ success, patient-centered outcomes (PROs), clinical peri-implant conditions, bone-level changes, alteration of peri-implant soft-tissue dimensions and the accuracy of digital implant planning.
Interventions
- Procedure Immediate Loading
The implant receives an artificial tooth the same day as it is placed. - Procedure Early Loading
The implant receives an artificial tooth 4 weeks after placement.
Primary outcome measures
- Implant Survival [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
- Prosthetic Success [Time frame: 10 years]
- Patient's satisfaction [Time frame: 10 years]
- Clinical peri-implant soft tissue dimensions [Time frame: 10 years]
- Crestal bone level [Time frame: 10 years]
- Accuracy of digital implant planning [Time frame: 12 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥ 20 years
- Willingness to sign informed consent and to participate in the study
- Plaque index according to Silness and Loe of < 35% \[26\]
- Presence of a mandibular first molar that has to be extracted
- Sufficient vertical interocclusal space for the placement of an implant crown (7 mm)
- Presence of an opposing natural or artificial tooth
- Ridge height sufficient for the placement of a ≥ 10 mm-long implant
- Sufficient ridge width for the placement of a 4.1mm diameter implant
Exclusion criteria
- Any physical or mental disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or the capability of providing written informed consent and compliance to the protocol
- Any disorder that would interfere with wound healing or represent a contraindication for implant surgery such as, but not limited to, uncontrolled diabetes or conditions resulting in or requiring immunosuppression, radiation, chemotherapy, frequent use of antibiotics or antiresorptive medication such as bisphosphonates
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Intention to become pregnant between inclusion and implant loading
- Heavy smoking habit with ≥ 10 cig/d
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits, present oro-facial pain
- Insufficient ridge width/height for the study implant
- Defect of any alveolar wall (secondary exclusion criterion at tooth extraction)
- ISQ < 70 (secondary exclusion criterion for Group A at implant placement, for Group B at loading visit)
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Switzerland · 2 centers
- Klinik für Oralchirurgie und Stomatologie — Bern
- Klinik für rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin und Gerodontologie — Bern
Identifiers
NCT: NCT04319042 · ITI 1455_2019