The DBCG Proton Trial: Photon Versus Proton Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Proton versus photon radiation therapy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Early Breast Cancer, Radiation Associated Cardiac Failure. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Denmark
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
The DBCG Proton Trial. Adjuvant Breast Proton Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer Patients: The Skagen Trial 2, a Clinically Controlled Randomised Phase III Trial
Overview
The majority of early breast cancer patients are treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) as part of their multimodal therapy. The aim of the RT is to lower the risk of local, regional and distant failure and improve survival. Modern RT is been provided with photon therapy. Now, more proton therapy facilities are opened, including in Denmark. Proton RT may have the potential to cause lower dose to heart and lung during breast RT. This trial will randomise patients between standard photon RT versus experimental proton RT. The primary endpoint is 10 year risk of heart disease.
Detailed description
Adjuvant breast cancer radiation therapy (RT) is standard for all patients operated with breast conservation and for patients diagnosed with large tumours and/or node-positive disease. Around 65% of all breast cancer patients treated with RT have whole breast RT without nodal RT, whilst the remaining 35% are treated with loco-regional RT (target is breast / chest wall and regional nodal volumes). RT leads to fewer local and regional recurrences, a decrease in breast cancer death and improves overall survival. Since 2014, when the DBCG IMN study showed overall survival gain from internal mammary node (IMN) RT, IMN RT has been standard for all high-risk patients in Denmark. IMN RT causes a significant increase in dose to the heart and lung, thus heart and lung sparing RT techniques based on deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), volumetric arc therapy and tomotherapy are increasingly used to lower dose to heart and lung whilst maintaining dose to breast and nodal targets. These advanced techniques are used in all DBCG departments routinely. Despite using advanced RT techniques, some patients still receive high RT dose to heart and lung.
Proton therapy (PT) has not been widely used nor investigated for adjuvant breast cancer RT, because there are only few proton centres. However, due to the properties of PT it is possible to achieve optimal dose coverage of relevant targets and at the same time ensure low dose to organs at risk compared with photon RT. In an energy-dependent manner, PT will deposit the majority of its dose in tissue depths defined by the Bragg peak. In practice, this translates into i) the ability to deliver the peak energy to target volumes of irregular 3-dimensional shape using pencil-beam scanning technology, ii) a sharp dose fall-off following deposition of energy in the target and iii) reduction of the integral dose to the patient. Within millimeters, the exit dose drops off from 90% to 10%, resulting in the virtual absence of an exit dose. The effectiveness, safety and feasibility of PT has been reported in few small cohort studies with limited follow up, and there is a lack of clinically controlled randomised trials documenting benefit from PT, evaluated either as higher tumour control and/or as fewer morbidities.
This trial tests standard photon RT versus experimental proton RT for selected early breast cancer patients.
Interventions
- Radiation Proton versus photon radiation therapy
The intervention is proton radiation therapy versus photon radiation therapy
Primary outcome measures
- Radiation associated ischaemic and valvular heart disease [Time frame: 10 years after RT]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
- Radiation associated second cancer [Time frame: 10 years after RT]
- Distant failure [Time frame: 10 years after RT]
- Acute radiation associated morbidity [Time frame: within 6 months after RT]
- Late radiation associated morbidity [Time frame: 10 years after RT]
- Patient reported outcome measures [Time frame: 10 years after RT]
- Translational research [Time frame: 10 years after RT]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patient operated for early breast cancer with indication for radiation therapy, where standard planning shows a mean heart dose 4 Gy or more and/or a V20 lung of 37% or more.
- Boost (breast, chest wall and nodal), breast reconstruction (any type, except implants with metal), connective tissue disease, post-operative surgical complications, any breast size and seromas are allowed
- Patient with previous non-breast malignancy is accepted if the patient has been without disease minimum 5 years, and the treating oncologist estimates a low risk of recurrence.
- Life expectancy minimum 10 years
Exclusion criteria
- previous breast cancer/ductal carcinoma in situ,
- Previous RT to the chest region
- Pregnant or lactating
- Conditions indicating that the patient cannot go through the RT or follow up
- Patients with Pacemaker or defibrillator are excluded until a guideline for handling them has been developed at the DCPT
- Unknown non-tissue implants upstream of the target volume. NB. all such non-tissue, non-metal objects must be delivered to the DCPT for stopping power determination and evaluation at least a week prior to radiation start.
- Metal implants in the radiation area, including metal in implants.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Denmark · 8 centers
- Aalborg University Hospital — Aalborg
- Aarhus University Hospital — Aarhus
- The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group — Copenhagen
- Rigshospitalet — Copenhagen
- Herlev Hospital — Herlev
- Naestved Hospital — Næstved
- Odense University Hospital — Odense
- Vejle Hospital — Vejle
Identifiers
NCT: NCT04291378 · DBCG Proton trial