Menu
Recruiting NCT04149782

Gathering Records to Evaluate Antiretroviral Treatment-South Africa

Observational HIV

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Routine medical record data collection.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: HIV. Basic parameters: from 15 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
South Africa
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Analysis of Existing Medical Record Data to Evaluate Coverage, Uptake, Benefits, and Costs of Differentiated Models of Service Delivery for HIV Treatment in Africa (South Africa)

Overview

To achieve global goals for the treatment of HIV, most high-prevalence countries are experimenting with and scaling up differentiated service delivery models (DSD). A handful of efforts have been formally described and evaluated in the literature; many others are being implemented formally or informally under routine care, without a research or evaluation goal. For most countries, however, we have little evidence on the big picture-the proportion of clinics offering alternative models, eligibility criteria and the proportion of patients considered eligible, the number of patients actually participating, health outcomes such as viral suppression, empirical resource utilization compared to traditional care, variations among the models, duration of patient participation, fidelity to model guidelines, effects on clinic efficiency, and sustainability without external donor support. AMBIT a set of data synthesis, data collection, and data analysis activities aimed at generating information for near- and long-term decision making and creating an approach and platform for ongoing evaluation of differentiated models of HIV treatment delivery in the future. The project will collect and analyze a wide range of existing data sets pertinent to DSD. This protocol is for an analysis of existing medical record data collected by the Department of Health, implementing partners, and other completed, ongoing, or new evaluations, trials, and observational studies. Outcomes to be reported include coverage/uptake of DSD, patients' outcomes, and distribution of each model. There will be no study interaction with individual patients, providers, caregivers, or others for this analysis.

Interventions

  • Other Routine medical record data collection
    The study will collect routine medical record data from the electronic medical record system, other electronic databases, and paper charts.

Primary outcome measures

  • Patient-months enrolled in any DSD model [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Patient-months enrolled in any DSD model [Time frame: 24 months]
  • Patient-months enrolled in any DSD model [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 15 years old
  • Patients accessing care for HIV within the data collection period
  • In any HIV transmission risk group

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

South Africa · 1 center
  • All clinics — Johannesburg

Publications

  • Huber AN, Jamieson L, Fox MP, Manganye M, Malala L, Chidarikire T, Khoza N, Nichols BE, Rosen S, Pascoe S. Evaluating the impact of differentiated service delivery (DSD) on retention in care and HIV viral suppression in South Africa: A target trial emulation using routine healthcare data. PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 26;22(8):e1004489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004489. eCollection 2025 Aug. PMID 40857347

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04149782 · H-38815

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗