Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT04093375

Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

No phase Interventional Prostatic Neoplasms

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Radical Prostatectomy, Radical Radiotherapy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Prostatic Neoplasms. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · Male.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Primary Radical Prostatectomy Versus Primary Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: an Open Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

This prospective, open randomized clinical trial seeks to investigate whether radical prostatectomy with androgen deprivation therapy improves prostate-cancer specific survival and quality of life in comparison with radical radiation treatment with androgen deprivation therapy among patients diagnosed locally advanced prostate cancer. Lack of extensive PSA screening in mainland China, many new cases of prostate cancer are LAPCa. Surgery and/or radiation plus attempted chemotherapy are curative treatment for advanced solid malign tumors to control and eliminate the local and micro metastases. LAPCa is easy to metastasis, relapse and has a poor prognosis. For LAPCa, a single RP approach is generally not the preferred option because it is generally considered that radical surgery is difficult to completely remove the lesion and the long-term prognosis is not ideal. However, androgen deprivation therapy promotes the prognosis of LAPCa with lymph nodes or seminal vesicle metastases and improves the local control rate of tumor. What is more, for early localized prostate cancer, RT has similar efficacy to RP, for advanced tumor RT can not only relieve urinary tract obstruction and other symptoms, but also improve biochemical progression free survival and local oncological control. A randomized clinical trial comparing two multimodal treatment including RP or RT with ADT regimens is therefore warranted.

Interventions

  • Procedure Radical Prostatectomy
    Radical prostatectomy with or without androgen deprivation therapy
  • Other Radical Radiotherapy
    Radical Radiotherapy with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy

Primary outcome measures

  • Cause-specific survival [Time frame: Up to 5 years]
  • Overall survival [Time frame: Up to 5 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • 18≤Age ≤75, at the time of randomization.
  • Confirmed as non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma by transrectal ultrasound biopsy in six months before enrollment and untreated.
  • Tumor stage (T, M, N): according to 2018 NCCN prostate cancer guidelines T3 stage Significant extra-capsular tumor extension M0 (no sign of distant metastases) Nx (regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed). For patients with T4, the tumor should be confined to the bladder neck, and bilateral ureters should not be invaded.
  • WHO score 0-1, ECOG score 0-2, and ASA grade I-III.
  • At least 5 years life expectancy.
  • The general condition and mental status of patients shall permit observation in accordance with the study protocol.
  • Signed Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Concomitant with other malignancies.
  • With severe systemic disease (cardio-cerebrovascular disease, etc.) cannot tolerate surgery or radiotherapy.
  • Clinical significant abnormal laboratory values at the discretion of the investigator, e.g. severe kidney function GFR < 30 ml/ml or elevated liver transaminases above > 10 ULN.
  • Involved in other clinical trials simultaneously.
  • Any medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04093375 · 2019CR101

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗