Menu
Recruiting NCT04052373

Peri-implantitis Implantoplasty Treatment

No phase Interventional Peri-Implantitis Peri-implant Mucositis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Implantoplasty, Open flap debridement alone.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Peri-Implantitis, Peri-implant Mucositis. Basic parameters: from 20 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Norway
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Surgical Peri-implantitis Treatment With and Without Implantoplasty

Overview

This double arm, split-mouth, single centre, controlled, randomised clinical study is designed to examine the effect of implantoplasty in treatment of peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis will be treated with open flap debridement, with or without implantoplasty.

Interventions

  • Procedure Implantoplasty
    Implantoplasty is the mechanical smoothening of rough titanium implants as part of the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Treatment is thought to facilitate self-performed oral hygiene.
  • Procedure Open flap debridement alone
    Open flap debridement alone

Primary outcome measures

  • Bleeding on probing [Time frame: 12 months after treatment]
  • Bleeding on probing [Time frame: 24 months after treatment]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Suppuration [Time frame: 12 months after treatment]
  • Suppuration [Time frame: 24 months after treatment]
  • Pocket probing depth [Time frame: 12 months after treatment]
  • Pocket probing depth [Time frame: 24 months after treatment]
  • Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL) [Time frame: Preoperatively compared to 24 months after treatment]
  • Clinical attachment loss measurements [Time frame: 12 months after treatment]
  • Clinical attachment loss measurements [Time frame: 24 months after treatment]
  • Radiographic bone loss [Time frame: 12 months after treatment]
  • Radiographic bone loss [Time frame: 24 months after treatment]
  • Implant fracture [Time frame: 24 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Peri-implantitis (according to 2018 criteria) on minimum 2 implants of similar surface and defect type
  • Competent to give consent
  • Exposed, modified implant surface with loss >2mm

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous radiotherapy to the jaws, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment
  • Present or past use of bisphosphonate treatment • Pregnant or nursing subjects
  • Patients classified as > class II according to ASA classification
  • Implant unavailable for implantoplasty treatment
  • Inhability to comprehend and respond to the quality of life questionnaire
  • Examiners/operators deem original placement of implant (angle, position) suboptimal and considered to play a major role in development of peri-implantitis
  • History of peri-implantitis surgery prior to 6 months of screening

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Norway · 2 centers
  • Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo — Oslo
  • Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway — Oslo

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04052373 · IMPLANTOPLASTY

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗