Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT04012710

vNOTES for Salpingo-oophorectomy

No phase Interventional Surgery

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Laparoscopy, vNOTES.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Surgery. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Israel
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery- A New Approach to Salpingo-oophorectomy

Overview

The aim of this study is to compare the common approach of laparoscopy for bilateral salpingo - oophorectomy to a new approach via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Detailed description

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is an emerging field in minimally invasive surgery. NOTES can be performed via a variety of approaches, including through the stomach, esophagus, bladder, and rectum, but the majority of cases have been performed transvaginally (vNOTES).

The vNOTES technique includes conventional, laparoscopic instruments that are inserted through a single-port device that enables the insertion of 1 10-mm trocar, and 4 5-mm trocars. The operation in carried out placing the patient in the lithotomy position. After completing general anaesthesia, a 2.5-cm posterior colpotomy is made. The pouch of Douglas is opened and the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) port is inserted transvaginally. A pneumoperitoneum is created, and the pelvic cavity, including the uterus and the adnexa is demonstrated. Only then, the conventional laparoscopic instruments are inserted.

By incorporating the advantages of endoscopic surgery, the vNOTES approach avoids abdominal wall wounds and trocar-related complications, including reducing post operation pain. Moreover, recent studies report, shorter hospital stay, improved visibility, and the possibility to circumvent extensive lysis of adhesion to reach the pelvic cavity. It should be mentioned that operative risks such as : anesthesia complications, excessive blood loss, damage to near organs ( intestines or bladder), and vasculature damage exists in both conventional laparoscopy and vNOTES approach.

vNOTES technique has been used for hysterectomy and was proven to be just as good as laparoscopy with the advantage of daycare surgery. The use of vNOTES for salpingo-oophorectomy without concomitant hysterectomy has been questioned due to challenging accessibility. To the best of our knowledge, data concerning the experience using this technique for salpingo-oophorectomy is scarce and based on few published case-reports.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the common approach of laparoscopy for bilateral salpingo - oophorectomy to a new approach via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Material and methods

This is a randomized prospective study including women admitted electively to a single care center for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to benign indication. Women that will be found to fit inclusion criteria will get by the research team explanation on both techniques. After giving informed consent, all women will be allocated to one of two operative techniques by en-block randomization:

1. Laparoscopy 2. vNOTES

Both operations will be done by a single highly skilled operator. All women will sign informed consent before admitted to operation room. Patient's demographics, characteristics, perioperative, operative and post-operative data will be collected from medical records. Data will be coded in order to save confidentiality ( each serial number will identify a patient. The list of serial numbers that fits each identification number will be available only for the principle investigator ).

Interventions

  • Procedure Laparoscopy
    Conventional abdominal laparoscopy
  • Procedure vNOTES
    Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for salpingo-oophorectomy

Primary outcome measures

  • Intra - Operative complication rate [Time frame: Intra - Operative]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Woman satisfaction rate post operation [Time frame: Estimated on post operation day -1- through study completion, an average of 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective surgery
  • Benign indication for surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe endometriosis
  • Past pelvic operations
  • Suspected malignancy
  • Combined planned hysterectomy
  • Recurrent Pelvic Inflammatory disease (PID)
  • Vaginal anomaly

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

Israel · 1 center
  • Aya Mohr Sasson — Ramat Gan

Publications

  • Jallad K, Walters MD. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60(2):324-329. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000280. PMID 28221179
  • Tantitamit T, Lee CL. Application of Sentinel Lymph Node Technique to Transvaginal Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):949-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 5. PMID 30296476
  • Boesen L, Meisner S, Vilmann P, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Donatsky AM. [Transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2016 Jan 25;178(4):V06150482. Danish. PMID 26815719
  • Hiep PN, Thien HH, Vu PA, Thanh PH, Xuan NT. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. BJS Open. 2017 May 24;1(1):24-29. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.4. eCollection 2017 Feb. PMID 29951602
  • Baekelandt J. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to ovarian cystectomy. Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):366. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Dec 13. PMID 29246560
  • Baekelandt J, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol BW, Bosteels JJ. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 J PMID 27880893
  • Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol B, Bosteels J. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15504. PMID 30325565
  • Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol BWJ, Bosteels JJA. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e018059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018059. PMID 29326183

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04012710 · 32-19-ASMC

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗