Immediate Vs. Delayed Weight Bearing Postoperative Protocol in Diabetic Ankle Fractures
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Postoperative protocol (Immediate weight bearing), Postoperative Protocol (Delayed Weight Bearing).
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Ankle Fractures. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Operatively managed diabetic ankle fractures have significant risk for complications. The cause for failure is likely multifactorial, however, a component of failure has to do with an inability to process pain and pressure normally. This loss of protective sensation allows for an increase in abnormal stresses placed on the recently repaired fractures. Historically, diabetics have been kept non weight bearing for extended periods of time, which has its own functional and cardiovascular issues. The purpose of the study is to determine if a protocol of immediate weight bearing with a hindfoot offloading brace after surgically corrected ankle fracture in a diabetic patient will maintain adequate motion, have no difference in complications when compared to regular non-immediate weight bearing protocols, and lead to good outcome scores and patient satisfaction scores
Detailed description
Operatively managed diabetic ankle fractures have significant risk for complications. The cause for failure is likely multifactorial, however, a component of failure has to do with an inability to process pain and pressure normally. This loss of protective sensation allows for an increase in abnormal stresses placed on the recently repaired fractures. Historically, diabetics have been kept non weight bearing for extended periods of time, which has its own functional and cardiovascular issues. The purpose of the study is to determine if a protocol of immediate weight bearing with a hindfoot offloading brace after surgically corrected ankle fracture in a diabetic patient will maintain adequate motion, have no difference in complications when compared to regular non-immediate weight bearing protocols, and lead to good outcome scores and patient satisfaction scores
Patients will be recruited from the trauma and foot \& ankle service lines. Patients who have experienced an isolated ankle fracture (excluding pilon fracture) and will undergo operative fixation within 3 weeks of injury will be approached for consent. Patients will then be screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Up to 25 patients will be enrolled
The following protocol will be applied after enrollment
1. Pre-operatively
a. Hemoglobin A1c will also be collected from each patient if it has not been performed within the last 30 days. 2. Post-operatively a. Post-surgery i. Standard of Care:
1\. Placement into short leg, non-weight bearing splint to allow for wound healing and brace fabrication ii. Research Specific:
1\. Fitted for brace (will be custom made and take approximately 1-2 weeks) b. 2 week visit (standard of care timepoint) i. Standard of Care:
1. Placed into compression stockings 2. Counseling regarding skin checks and diabetic skin care 3. Physical therapy prescription given ii. Research Specific
1\. Placement into brace so it offloads the hindfoot to 15 pounds of pressure or less 2. Education by prosthetist, physiatrist, and/or attending physician about proper brace wear and maintenance, and the importance of weight bearing only in brace.
c. 3 Week visit (not standard of care timepoint) i. Research Specific
1\. Ankle radiographs d. 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 Weeks, 26 weeks, and 1 year visits (standard of care time points) i. Standard of Care
1. Surveys (PROMIS, AAOS Foot and Ankle) 2. Ankle Radiographs ii. Research Specific
1\. Counseling regarding brace wear 2. Brace adjustments as needed e. 8 week, 10 week, 14 week, 16 week, (non-standard of care biweekly visits until healing occurs) i. Research Specific
1. Ankle Radiographs (if early failure is suspected) 2. Skin Check
Upon study completion, patients will continue with post-operative rehab following the surgeon's standard of care. If a patients is removed prematurely or if the study ends prematurely, they will receive standard of care procedures going forward
Interventions
- Other Postoperative protocol (Immediate weight bearing)
After ORIF of the ankle fracture, the patient will be randomized to follow an immediate weight bearing rehabilitation protocol using an offloading hindfoot brace - Other Postoperative Protocol (Delayed Weight Bearing)
After ORIF of the ankle fracture, the patient will be randomized to follow a standard delayed weight-bearing rehabilitation protocol
Primary outcome measures
- Adverse Events [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- AAOS Foot and Ankle Score [Time frame: 12 Months]
- PROMIS Score [Time frame: 12 Months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adults 18 and ove
- Positive for diabetes
- Positive monofilament test
- Isolated ankle fracture (non-pilon) and undergoing operative intervention within 3 weeks of fracture
- Weight less than 275 (124kg)
- Can tolerate and comply with brace
- No signs of pre-existing charcot arthroplasty or ankle deformity
Exclusion criteria
- Children
- Pregnant patients
- No signs of diabetes complicated by neuropathy
- Non-operative ankle fractures
- Multiple extremity injury
- Cannot follow post-operative protocol
- Chronic ankle fractures receiving surgery beyond 3 weeks of injury
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- University of Missouri Health System — Columbia
Publications
- Raghav A, Khan ZA, Labala RK, Ahmad J, Noor S, Mishra BK. Financial burden of diabetic foot ulcers to world: a progressive topic to discuss always. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jan;9(1):29-31. doi: 10.1177/2042018817744513. Epub 2017 Dec 12. PMID 29344337
- Jani MM, Ricci WM, Borrelli J Jr, Barrett SE, Johnson JE. A protocol for treatment of unstable ankle fractures using transarticular fixation in patients with diabetes mellitus and loss of protective sensibility. Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Nov;24(11):838-44. doi: 10.1177/107110070302401106. PMID 14655888
- Shehab DK, Al-Jarallah KF, Abraham M, Mojiminiyi OA, Al-Mohamedy H, Abdella NA. Back to basics: ankle reflex in the evaluation of peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. QJM. 2012 Apr;105(4):315-20. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr212. Epub 2011 Nov 8. PMID 22071964
- Wukich DK, Kline AJ. The management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jul;90(7):1570-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01673. PMID 18594108
- Holder CG, Haskvitz EM, Weltman A. The effects of assistive devices on the oxygen cost, cardiovascular stress, and perception of nonweight-bearing ambulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993 Oct;18(4):537-42. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1993.18.4.537. PMID 8220412
Identifiers
NCT: NCT03966027 · 2014997