Quantify the Degree of Pain Relief of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome Following Gonadal Vein Embolization
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Pelvic Congestive Syndrome, Pelvic Pain. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Quantification of Pain Relief With Gonadal Vein Embolization for Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Overview
The primary objective is to quantify the degree of pain relief in patients undergoing gonadal vein embolization with coils as well as identify clinical or imaging factors that are predictive of a positive response to treatment, or poor response to treatment.
Detailed description
Chronic pelvic pain affects almost 40% of women during their lifetime. Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) accounts for up to 30% of those with chronic pelvic pain. The most common underlying cause of PCS is incompetence or obstruction of the gonadal veins, resulting in painful congestion of the pelvic and perineal venous vasculature. Medical treatment is first line, and aims to suppress ovarian function and induce vasoconstriction of the venous system. Unfortunately, efficacy and long-term pain relief from medical therapy is limited. Coil embolization of the gonadal veins has been shown to decrease pain in those affected by PCS, although the degree of relief has not yet been quantified.
Primary outcome measures
- Quantify pain relief using the Pelvic Congestion Symptom Pain Scale after gonadal vein embolization [Time frame: Change from baseline (before gonadal vein embolization) to 360 days post-procedure.]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Predict positive or poor response to gonadal vein embolization treatment [Time frame: Change from baseline (before gonadal vein embolization) to 360 days post-procedure.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Female patients 18 years of age or older
- Meet the clinical and imaging criteria for the diagnosis of PCS and have no contraindications to coil embolization of the gonadal veins.
- Patients who are treated with coil embolization of the gonadal veins in the Interventional Radiology division between October 1, 2018 to October 1, 2019.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients less than 18 years of age.
- Patients who are found to have an underlying cause of pelvic congestion syndrome unrelated to venous congestion and insufficiency. This includes, but is not limited to, nutcracker syndrome, or a mass resulting in extrinsic compression of the gonadal veins.
- Patients who have received prior surgical therapy for PCS, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO), gonadal vein resection, or gonadal vein ligation.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- The University of Kansas Medical Center — Kansas City
Publications
- Ignacio EA, Dua R, Sarin S, Harper AS, Yim D, Mathur V, Venbrux AC. Pelvic congestion syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008 Dec;25(4):361-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102998. PMID 21326577
- O'Brien MT, Gillespie DL. Diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015 Jan;3(1):96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 25. PMID 26993690
- Koo S, Fan CM. Pelvic congestion syndrome and pelvic varicosities. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jun;17(2):90-5. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2014.02.005. PMID 24840963
- Lopez AJ. Female Pelvic Vein Embolization: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Aug;38(4):806-20. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1074-7. Epub 2015 Mar 25. PMID 25804635
- Daniels JP, Champaneria R, Shah L, Gupta JK, Birch J, Moss JG. Effectiveness of Embolization or Sclerotherapy of Pelvic Veins for Reducing Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1478-1486.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Jul 7. PMID 27397619
- Brown CL, Rizer M, Alexander R, Sharpe EE 3rd, Rochon PJ. Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Systematic Review of Treatment Success. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018 Mar;35(1):35-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1636519. Epub 2018 Apr 5. PMID 29628614
- Guirola JA, Sanchez-Ballestin M, Sierre S, Lahuerta C, Mayoral V, De Gregorio MA. A Randomized Trial of Endovascular Embolization Treatment in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Fibered Platinum Coils versus Vascular Plugs with 1-Year Clinical Outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jan;29(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Nov 22. PMID 29174618
Identifiers
NCT: NCT03794466 · STUDY00143045