Menu
Recruiting NCT03615872

Pessary Satisfaction Criteria for Urogenital Prolapse

Observational Genital Prolapse Pessary Satisfaction

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: pessary use.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Genital Prolapse, Pessary, Satisfaction. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction With Pessary in the Treatment of Genital Prolapse

Overview

Genital prolapse is a common pathology with a prevalence ranging from 2.9 to 11.4% or 31.8% to 97.7%, depending on whether a questionnaire or clinical examination is used. The use of pessary in the treatment of prolapse remains discussed despite a satisfaction rate of 50 to 80% in the literature and a minimal complications rate. The main objective of this study is to assess the satisfaction of patients carrying a pessary in the first year after the laying.

Detailed description

This is a prospective observational cohort conducted at the Universitary hospital of Caen over a total period of 5 years.

Patients with a symptomatic genital prolapse will all be offered the installation of a pessary. If they agree to participate in the study, they will be asked to respond to validated questionnaires: symptom questionnaires (PFDI-20, ICIQ-SF, USP), a sexuality questionnaire (PISQ-12), a quality of life questionnaire (PFIQ-7, BIS) and Satisfaction (PGI-I), several times: Before the installation of the pessary, at one month, at 6 months, then annually over 5 years

Interventions

  • Device pessary use
    evaluation of satisfaction of pessary use in case of symptomatic genital prolapse

Primary outcome measures

  • Patient SATISFACTION assessed by the PGI-I score (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) in the first year after the installation of a pessary [Time frame: 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Patient SATISFACTION assessed by the PGI-I score (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) every year for five years after the installation of a pessary [Time frame: 1 to 5 years]
  • EFFICACY of pessary on genital symptoms assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire before and after the installation of the pessary. [Time frame: at 1 year, then every year for 5 years]
  • EFFICACY of pessary on urinary symptoms assessed by the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and the Urinary Symptom Profile score (USP) before and after the installation of the pessary. [Time frame: at 1 year, then every year for 5 years]
  • Sexual impact of pessary assessed by the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) [Time frame: at 1 year, then every year for 5 years]
  • QUALITY OF LIFE assessed by the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) before and after the installation of the pessary [Time frame: at 1 year, then every year for 5 years]
  • INVESTIGATE the impact of age on the removal or expulsion of pessary [Time frame: 1 year to 5 years]
  • INVESTIGATE the impact of menopausal status on the removal or expulsion of pessary [Time frame: 1 year to 5 years]
  • INVESTIGATE the impact of weight on the removal or expulsion of pessary [Time frame: 1 year to 5 years]
  • INVESTIGATE the impact of hysterectomy history on the removal or expulsion of pessary [Time frame: 1 year to 5 years]
  • INVESTIGATE the impact of prolapse surgery history on the removal or expulsion of pessary [Time frame: 1 year to 5 years]
  • INVESTIGATE the impact of the prolapse stage of on the removal or expulsion of pessary [Time frame: 1 year to 5 years]
  • Complications of pessary use reported by their rate [Time frame: 1 to 5 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • The research protocol will be proposed to all patients with a symptomatic genital prolapse, over 18 years of age, who speak French and who agree to participate in this study
  • Prolapse defined according to the International Classification POP-Q-.

Exclusion criteria

  • Minors under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Women Not speaking French (the good understanding of French is necessary to answer questionnaires and for informed information)
  • Women unable to understand due to cognitive impairment or degenerative disease (dementia/ Alzheimer's disease)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Pizzoferato — Caen

Publications

  • Cundiff GW, Amundsen CL, Bent AE, Coates KW, Schaffer JI, Strohbehn K, Handa VL. The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):405.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018. PMID 17403437
  • Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;190(4):1025-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.711. PMID 15118635
  • Patel M, Mellen C, O'Sullivan DM, LaSala CA. Impact of pessary use on prolapse symptoms, quality of life, and body image. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;202(5):499.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Feb 20. PMID 20171608
  • Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G. A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;114(1):56-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 May 14. PMID 21575953
  • Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.048. PMID 15295358
  • Panman CM, Wiegersma M, Kollen BJ, Burger H, Berger MY, Dekker JH. Predictors of unsuccessful pessary fitting in women with prolapse: a cross-sectional study in general practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):307-313. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3107-4. Epub 2016 Aug 15. PMID 27525693
  • Markle D, Skoczylas L, Goldsmith C, Noblett K. Patient characteristics associated with a successful pessary fitting. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Sep;17(5):249-52. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31822f00ae. PMID 22453110
  • Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT. Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.012. PMID 16021064

Identifiers

NCT: NCT03615872 · 2018-A00004-51

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗