Menu
Recruiting NCT03471403

Cold Snare Polypectomy for Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Observational Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Basic parameters: 18 years — 99 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Australia
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The purpose of this study is to collect prospective observational data regarding patients with diagnosed Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) undergoing cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas

Detailed description

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a autosomal dominant disorder, secondary to a germ-line mutation in the tumour suppressor gene and characterised by multiple colorectal polyps (\>100). Typically colorectal adenomas develop in the second and third decade of life. As a result these patients require an endoscopic colonic surveillance program, especially for at-risk family members, which usually begins in the 2nd decade of life starting with annual flexible sigmoidoscopies. The lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is 100 percent, if left untreated and patient usually develop CRC in the 4th-5th decade of life. The patient's thus usually progress to a total colectomy.

FAP is also associated with adenomas in the upper gastrointestinal tract and is in nearly 90% of patients with FAP by age 70.Upper gastrointestinal tract screening with gastroscopies commences usually from 25-30 years of age. Usually a duodenoscopy is performed simultaneously to assess for ampullary adenomas. Although surgical procedures have been shown to be effective and have changed the natural history of colorectal cancer in FAP the management of duodenal adenomatosis remains a challenge. The prevalence of FAP associated duodenal adenomas has led to the development of Spigelman classification which assigns surveillance intervals by dividing patient's into four group based on size, histology and severity of dysplasia on histology7. Local endoscopic therapy options available for duodenal adenomatosis include; snare polypectomy, thermal ablation (using a mono/bipolar current) and laser coagulation each with their own limitation. Endoscopic intervention is usually recommended for Spigelman stage II and III disease.

Duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been shown to be safe and effective methods in removing flat duodenal adenomas in FAP as observed in small case series. However as with colonic EMR these patient's automatically are placed in a higher risk group with the feared complications of delayed bleeding (per and post procedure) and perforation, with the former being as high as 10-15%. The bleeding risk is especially increased in the duodenum due to the rich vascularity of the sub-mucosal layer.

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been shown to be a safe and effective method for removing diminutive colorectal polyps (\<8mm) as compared to conventional polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

A small case series published the use of a hybrid technique, for duodenal adenomas, where a submucosal injection is performed underneath the lesion to separate the mucosa from the larger sub-mucosal vessels from which bleeding risk is thought to arise. By then performing cold snare piece-meal polypectomy and avoiding the need for thermal therapy risk of delayed bleeding associated is significantly reduced as compared to conventional EMR.

Isolated case report using CSP in non-ampullary duodenal adenomas have shown this technique to be effective.

No large studies to date have examined the use of this technique for duodenal adenomas.

Primary outcome measures

  • Number of serious and non-serious adverse events [Time frame: Three years]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Duration of endoscopic procedure [Time frame: Three years]
  • Perforation (peri-procedure and delayed) [Time frame: Three years]
  • Pain post procedure [Time frame: Three years]
  • Hospital readmission [Time frame: Three years]
  • Change in Spigelman stage [Time frame: Three years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient's diagnosed with a confirmed diagnosis of FAP (genetic testing) and able to give informed consent to involvement in trial. For patients who do not speak English, an interpreter will be asked to translate the informed consent
  • Patients already commenced on endoscopic surveillance for FAP.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient's with known strictures/stenosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who did not consent to study
  • Bleeding diathesis

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Australia · 1 center
  • Westmead Endoscopy Unit — Westmead

Identifiers

NCT: NCT03471403 · HREC/17/WMEAD/20(5002)

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗