Looking Glass: Bimanual Balanced Reaching With Visual Biofeedback
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Veridical Visual Feedback, Augmented Visual Feedback, Healthy Comparative Reaching Task.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Stroke, Stroke, Acute, Healthy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Bimanual Balanced Reaching With Visual Biofeedback
Overview
The goal of this research study is to increase understanding of error augmentation by applying it to visual feedback during motion tracking with a Leap Motion device - a recently developed optical hand tracking tool - and the LookingGlass - a new, portable virtual reality environment. In conjunction with the Leap, large, three dimensional work spaces can provide an immersive and virtual augmented environment for rehabilitation. Previously, experiments have utilized the Virtual Reality Robotic and Optical Operations Machine (VRROOM) to create such visually immersive environments. The Robotics lab as part of the Arms and Hands Lab on the 22nd floor of the Shirley Ryan Abilitylab has developed a portable version of this system, which is more compact and clinic-compatible. Combining this visual 3D system with the Leap creates a novel, more capable apparatus for studying error augmentation. This research study will have 3 different arms: 1.) a healthy group of individuals (Healthy Arm), 2.) a group of stroke survivors within 8 months of stroke (Acute Arm), and 3.) a group of stroke survivors that had their stroke more than 8 months ago (Chronic Arm). Each Arm will use the Leap motion tracker and the Looking Glass to participate in a reaching intervention. The healthy arm will only participate in 1 visit with an intervention with and without error augmented visual feedback. The Acute Arm and the Chronic Arm will both have 2 groups: 1.) Error Augmented Visual Feedback group and 2.) Non-Augmented or Veridical Visual Feedback group. The Chronic Arm will have a structured intervention and evaluation protocol: Study staff will administer outcome assessments at 3 time points: a.) prior to intervention, b.) post intervention, and c.) 2 months after the conclusion of intervention. Intervention will occur over the span of 6-8 weeks with the goal of 3 1-hour sessions per week. The Acute Arm will have a less structured intervention that will occur while the participant is an inpatient at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Study staff will administer outcome assessments at at least 2 time points: a.) prior to intervention, b.) post intervention just prior to discharge from Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Between initial and post intervention evaluations, midpoint evaluations will take place at a maximum of once per week if the participant's schedule, activity tolerance, and length of stay allows. Intervention will consist of 1-hour sessions occurring according to the availability of the participant at the rate of no more than 2 sessions in a 24 hour period. Investigators hope to investigate these questions: 1. Can the movement of healthy individuals be characterized with error augmented visual feedback and veridical visual feedback? 2. Will error augmented visual feedback or veridical visual feedback result in greater movement ability improvement? Investigators hypothesize that in the Chronic Arm, those what trained with error-augmented visual feedback will have improved movement ability compared to those who trained with veridical visual feedback. 3. Is treatment with the looking glass and leap system feasible with an inpatient population? Investigators hypothesize that this treatment will be feasible for an inpatient population.
Interventions
- Other Veridical Visual Feedback
Reaching while sitting at the Looking Glass system. The representation of arm movements will directly reflect the participants actual arm movements. - Other Augmented Visual Feedback
Reaching while sitting at the Looking Glass system. The representation of a participant's arm movements will be augmented to encourage different movement patterns and improved movement. - Other Healthy Comparative Reaching Task
Reaching while sitting at the Looking Glass system. This will occur over the course of 1 hour.
Primary outcome measures
- Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Score: Pre to Post/Discharge - Chronic and Acute Arms [Time frame: 1-3 weeks for acute arm; 9 weeks for chronic arm]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Score: Pre to Follow-up [Time frame: 4.5 months]
- Amount of use [Time frame: 1-3 weeks, on average]
- Action Research Arm Test Score: Pre to Post [Time frame: 1-3 weeks for acute arm; 9 weeks for chronic arm]
- Action Research Arm Test Score: Pre to Follow-Up [Time frame: 4.5 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- 8 months post stroke
- FMUE 15-50
- Active shoulder and elbow flexion-extension when supported against gravity to accomplish a forward mediolateral and inferior-superior reaching movements of 30 cm
Exclusion criteria
- Bilateral paresis
- Severe sensory deficits in the affected limb
- Severe spasticity preventing movement (MAS 4 or greater at elbow)
- Aphasia, cognitive impairment or affective dysfunction that influence ability to participate in the experiment
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Severe current medical problems
- Diffuse/multiple lesion sites or multiple strokes
- Hemi-spatial neglect or visual field cut preventing subjects from seeing the target
- Inability to maintain the testing positions
- Botox injections in the affected Upper Extremity within the past 4 months
- Concurrent participation in Upper Extremity rehab (research or prescribed therapy)
- Participation in previous, similar robotics intervention studies
- Pregnant women, children and teenagers, prisoners
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — Chicago
Publications
- Celian C, Puzzi T, Verardi M, Olavarria E, Porta F, Pedrocchi A, Patton JL. Does visual error augmentation offer advantages during bimanual therapy in individuals poststroke? A randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2025 Aug;53(8):3000605251361115. doi: 10.1177/03000605251361115. Epub 2025 Aug 9. PMID 40781976
Identifiers
NCT: NCT03300141 · STU00204661