Stop or Ongoing Oral Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Pvp (SOAP)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Maintenance of OAC in surgery of BPH by PVP., Discontinuation of OAC in surgery of BPH by PVP..
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Anticoagulant Adverse Reaction. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Male.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- France
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Multicenter Randomized Open-labelled Trial Which Aims to Show Non-inferiority of Adverse Events Risk During the Maintenance of Oral-anticoagulation in the Surgery of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy by Laser Photovaporization
Overview
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a very common pathology of the aging man with an incidence that rises from 40% in men aged 50 to 60 years to 90% in men over 80 years. Studies such as the MTOPS (the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms) study show that more than half of the patients recruited had an aggravation of their disease over time either by an increase in symptoms or by the appearance of complications such as acute retention of urine. For benign symptomatic prostate hypertrophy, apart from any complication, first-line treatment is now a medical treatment. For patients who respond poorly to medical treatment or who have complications related to benign prostatic hypertrophy, the treatment becomes surgical. The reference treatment is endoscopic prostate resection (TURP). It is mainly to improve the safety of hemostasis in patients older and older and at significant surgical risk that new "minimally invasive" surgical techniques have emerged. Thus, lasers have been developed and are currently used as an alternative to the TURP. Used in clinical practice since 2000, prostatic photosensitive vaporization (PVP) relies on the absorption of a 532nm (green) wavelength laser beam by the oxyhemoglobin contained in richly vascularized prostate tissue. Given the aging of the population, more and more patients are being treated with oral anticoagulants (Anti Vitamin K (AVK) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)). Today there are about 1.4 million people on oral anticoagulants, 40% of whom are over 80 years of age. The peri-operative management of the AVK is currently based on the recommendations published by the FHA (French Health Authority) in 2008. Concerning the perioperative management of DOACs, the perioperative haemostasis interest group (GIHP) made proposals updated in September 2015. Numerous studies published in the literature have concluded the feasibility of prostate removal surgery by PVP with greenlight laser without relay (or interruption) of AVK or DOACs because of the properties of hemostasis. But the levels of evidence for these studies remain low. No study has focused on rigorously assessing the perioperative hemorrhagic risk associated with OAC therapy in patients eligible for PVP, and this is the originality of this study. This study is a multicenter prospective randomized study whose objective is to show that the PVP performed in patients with OAC is not associated with an increase in perioperative hemorrhagic risk.
Detailed description
SOAP is a non-inferiority, multicentric, open-labelled, two parallel arms study.
The expected benefits are to foster and make the perioperative management of OAC safer in patients undergoing BPH surgery with PVP.
Interventions
- Other Maintenance of OAC in surgery of BPH by PVP.
The maintenance of AVK or DOACs treatment in the perioperative setting (without interruption of oral treatment). - Other Discontinuation of OAC in surgery of BPH by PVP.
The discontinuation of AVK or DOACs treatment with perioperative heparin relay during postoperative course.
Primary outcome measures
- Number of patients with at least one complication classified higher or equal to grade 2 according to the Clavien classification related to maintenance of oral-anticoagulant (OAC) during the surgical resection of BPH by laser at 1 month [Time frame: Between day 0 (day of the surgery) and day 30 (1 month after surgery)]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
- Number of patients with at least one hemorrhagic complication related to maintenance of oral-anticoagulant (OAC) during the surgical resection of BPH by laser at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
- Number of patients with at least one thrombotic complication related to maintenance of oral-anticoagulant (OAC) during the surgical resection of BPH by laser at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
- Duration of hospitalization related to perioperative management of anticoagulants will be measured at the patient's discharge [Time frame: At the patient's discharge, on average 3 days after surgery]
- Prostatic residual volume will be measured to evaluate the quality of resection under oral-anticoagulant at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
- PSA level will be measured to evaluate the quality of resection under oral-anticoagulant at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
- Questionnaires International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) will be complemented by patients to evaluate the functional success of surgery under oral-anticoagulant at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
- International Continence Society (ICS) will be complemented by patients to evaluate the functional success of surgery under oral-anticoagulant at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
- Volume of post-voiding residue will be measured to evaluate the functional success of surgery under oral-anticoagulant at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months [Time frame: At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Prostate volume < or = 30 gr
- Micturition disorders resistant to medical treatment related to HBP and/or complications related to BPH (retention, lithiasis...)
- Patient candidate for photovaporization of the prostate
- Patient under treatment AVK (Anti Vitamin K) for more than 3 months with an objective of INR (International Normalized Ratio) between 2 and 3 or patient under DOACs (Direct Oral Anti-coagulants) for more than 3 months
- Unprotected major
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or equivalent
- Patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements and to sign a study-specific informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
- History of prostate cancer
- Previous pelvic radiotherapy
- History of stenosis of the urethra
- Patient with one or more bladder polyps
- Patient under antiplatelet agent other than aspirin
- Allergy to heparin or history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
- Patients under anticoagulant injectable therapy at baseline (heparin, LMWH (Low Molecular Weight Heparin), fondaparinux)
- Any mechanical prosthetic heart valve
- Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), systemic embolism or transient ischemic attack within past 12 weeks
- Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) within past 12 weeks
- Major bleeding within past 6 weeks
- Severe renal insufficiency (calculated creatinine clearance < 30 mL / min)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 x 10\^9 / L)
- Life expectancy < 1 month
- Condition that impairs compliance with trial protocol (e.g. cognitive impairment, uncontrolled psychiatric condition, geographic inaccessibility)
- Contra-indication to PVP surgery or contra-indication to general anesthesia
- Protected patients : majors under some form of guardianship
- Patient participating in another clinical study
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Other
Study locations
France · 1 center
- Clinique Pasteur — Toulouse
Publications
- Kaplan SA, McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Meehan AG, Lee MW, Noble WR, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM Jr; Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) Research Group. Combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and a baseline total prostate volume of 25 ml or greater. J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):217-20; discussion 220-1. doi: 10. PMID 16406915
- Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, Kirby RS, Lukacs B, Meuleman E, O'Leary MP, Puppo P, Robertson C, Giuliano F. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):637-49. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.08.015. PMID 14644114
- Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d'Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyere F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi NK, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitan C, Knispel H, Bachmann A. A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing GreenLight-XPS Laser Vaporizat PMID 26283011
- Misrai V, Roupret M, Guillotreau J, Bordier B, Bruyere F. [Greenlight((R)) photoselective vaporisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review]. Prog Urol. 2013 Feb;23(2):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 26. French. PMID 23352299
- Peyronnet B, Cornu JN, Roupret M, Bruyere F, Misrai V. Trends in the Use of the GreenLight Laser in the Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Obstruction in France Over the Past 10 Years. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1193-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 17. No abstract available. PMID 25605646
- Ruszat R, Wyler S, Forster T, Reich O, Stief CG, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bachmann A. Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. Eur Urol. 2007 Apr;51(4):1031-8; discussion 1038-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Aug 18. PMID 16945475
- Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M, Hofstetter A, Stief CG, Sulser T. High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):158-60. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146631.14200.d4. PMID 15592063
- Charbonneau H, Pathak A, Albenque JP, Misrai V. Greenlight photovaporization of the prostate in patients under rivaroxaban: Lesson learned after the first cases. Prog Urol. 2016 Apr;26(5):273-5. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 9. No abstract available. PMID 26970929
Identifiers
NCT: NCT03297281 · 2017-A01236-47