Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction and Esophageal Diverticulum
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Zenker Diverticulum, Progressive Dysphagia, Pharyngoesophageal Diverticulum. Basic parameters: 18 years — 100 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Complete Title Used for Approval Letters. Cervical Diverticulum Prospective, Multi-Institutional Study Proposal
Overview
Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up.
Detailed description
A prospective, multi-institutional study comparing the effectiveness of the above procedures will provide a large cohort using standardized diagnostic studies, diverticulum size measurements, treatment approaches, pre-operative and post-operative assessment of symptoms in order to both compare the effectiveness of the procedures and to stratify the patients in order to determine whether demographics such as age, pre-operative size, and/or peri-operative co-morbidities influence outcomes.
Interventions
- Procedure open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment
The goal of the project is to perform the first prospective, multi-institutional long-term (5 year) study comparing the outcomes of open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment of cervical esophageal diverticulum and cricopharyngeal dysfunction in resolving associated symptoms, complications, and recurrence rates of dysphagia surgery. This study will also include cricopharyngeal bar as it pertains to an early Zenker's diverticulum.
Primary outcome measures
- Add to the paucity of dysphagia outcomes data after surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. [Time frame: 5 years]
- Include dysphagia outcomes comparing both endoscopic and open repair of Zenker's diverticulum to develop preliminary evidence-based indications and long-term outcomes, exploring various relevant subset analyses. [Time frame: 5 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients with a diagnosis of cervical esophageal diverticulum, with Zenker's as most common, or CP bar (with diagnosis of early Zenker) as indicated on an esophagram who the participating institutions enroll regardless of surgical management and future treatments. Patients undergoing open transcervical or endoscopic approach in which a laser or stapler is used to divide the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus, or who are not surgical candidates but agree to follow-up.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients who undergo division of the common wall between the diverticulum and esophagus using flexible endoscopy will not be included in the study.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- UC Health Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery — Cincinnati
Publications
- Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8. PMID 12150380
- Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210. PMID 19140539
- Bock JM, Van Daele DJ, Gupta N, Blumin JH. Management of Zenker's diverticulum in the endoscopic age: current practice patterns. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Dec;120(12):796-806. doi: 10.1177/000348941112001205. PMID 22279951
- Leong SC, Wilkie MD, Webb CJ. Endoscopic stapling of Zenker's diverticulum: establishing national baselines for auditing clinical outcomes in the United Kingdom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Aug;269(8):1877-84. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-1945-3. Epub 2012 Feb 17. PMID 22350426
- Parker NP, Misono S. Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):750-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521554. Epub 2014 Feb 4. PMID 24496741
- Verdonck J, Morton RP. Systematic review on treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3095-107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3267-0. Epub 2014 Sep 7. PMID 25194579
- Wilken R, Whited C, Scher RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: review of experience in 337 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jan;124(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/0003489414542421. Epub 2014 Jul 15. PMID 25026961
- Venkatesan NN, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Normal fluoroscopic appearance status post-successful endoscopic Zenker diverticulotomy. Laryngoscope. 2017 Aug;127(8):1762-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.26446. Epub 2017 Jan 4. PMID 28052332
Identifiers
NCT: NCT03187925 · 2016-6955