Menu
Recruiting NCT03142152

The EMPOWER Trial - The Carillon Mitral Contour System® in Treating Heart Failure With FMR

No phase Interventional Functional Mitral Regurgitation Heart Failure Mitral Valve Insufficiency Heart Diseases

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Carillon Mitral Contour System, Guideline Directed Heart Failure Medication.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Heart Failure, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Heart Diseases. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States, Canada, France, Greece, Italy +3
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Assessment of the Carillon Mitral Contour System® in Treating Heart Failure With Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Overview

The objective of this prospective, randomized, double- blinded (patient and assessors), sham-controlled clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of the CMCS in treating heart failure with functional regurgitation (FMR).

Detailed description

A total of 300 subjects will be randomized at up to 100 investigational sites in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Subjects will be randomized into one of two study groups using a 1:1 (Intervention : Control) ratio.

Study subjects who are eligible for this clinical study will undergo a transthoracic echocardiographic examination prior to randomization to evaluate the inclusion criteria associated with the severity of mitral regurgitation. A coronary angiogram will be performed to evaluate the coronary artery anatomy and a venogram to assess the suitability of the coronary sinus/great cardiac vein (CS/GCV) for placement of the Carillon implant.

If the subject meets the anatomic requirements for the Carillon implant placement, the subject will be randomized. Subjects who meet all eligibility criteria will be randomized into one of two study groups (Intervention or Control).

Subjects randomized to the Intervention group will undergo the Carillon implant procedure.

Subjects randomized to the Control group will experience an index procedure similar to the Intervention group (without implant placement) to ensure they will not be able to deduce the group assignment based on the type of intervention or time associated with the procedure.

After the study subjects are discharged, the subjects' primary care specialists (cardiologist/heart failure physician) and clinical investigation site staff will coordinate follow-up evaluations. Subjects will be evaluated at one (1), six (6), twelve (12), eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) months post-randomization, to assess long-term safety, and functional and clinical status.

After the 24-month evaluation, all subjects will be unblinded. All Intervention and Control subjects will be followed with an abbreviated annual contact and echocardiogram for an additional three (3) years, for a total of five (5) years.

Interventions

  • Device Carillon Mitral Contour System
    The Carillon implant is designed to be deployed, tensioned, and locked in the coronary vein in order to reshape the mitral annulus and thus reduce mitral annular dilation and mitral regurgitation.
  • Other Guideline Directed Heart Failure Medication
    Heart failure medication per ACC/AHA guidelines

Primary outcome measures

  • Primary Safety Objective - Freedom from Major Adverse Events [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Primary Efficacy Objective 1 - Hierarchical Clinical Composite [Time frame: 24 months]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Secondary Efficacy Objective 1- Regurgitant Volume [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Secondary Efficacy Objective 2 - Change in LV End-diastolic Volume [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Secondary Efficacy Objective 3 - Change in NYHA [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Secondary Efficacy Objective 4 - Hierarchical Clinical Composite [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Secondary Efficacy Objective 5 - Heart Failure Hospitalizations [Time frame: 12 months of follow-up, and any available data up to 24 months]
  • Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 1 - Change in Six-Minute Walk Distance [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 2 - Change in KCCQ [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 3 - Change in LV End-systolic Volume [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 4 - days lost due to HFH and CV death [Time frame: 12 months of follow-up, and any available data up to 24 months]
  • Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 5 - Alternative Therapies [Time frame: 12 months of follow-up, and any available data up to 24 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic heart failure with functional (secondary) mitral regurgitation of at least 1+ (mild) severity
  • NYHA II, III, or IV
  • Six Minute Walk distance ≥ 100 meters and ≤ 600 meters
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≤ 50%
  • LVEDD:
  • ≥ 55 mm (women)
  • ≥ 57 mm (men)
  • LVESD ≤ 75 mm
  • Corrected NT-proBNP > 1200 pg/ml measured within 60 days of randomization, and/or one or more heart failure hospitalizations within one year prior to consent or one or more outpatient visits for intensification of heart failure therapy within one year prior to consent.
  • Optimal Guideline directed heart failure medical therapy assessed by the Central Review Committee
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Carillon implant can be sized and placed in accordance with the IFU
  • The subject has been informed of the nature of the trial and agrees to its provisions, including the possibility of randomization to the Control group and returning for all required post-procedure follow-up visits, and has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of a mechanical or bio-prosthetic mitral valve or, mitral valve annuloplasty, or leaflet repair device
  • Significant organic mitral valve pathology (e.g., moderate or severe myxomatous degeneration, with or without mitral leaflet prolapse, rheumatic disease, full or partial chordal rupture)
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation associated with right ventricular dysfunction and enlargement
  • Severe mitral annular calcification
  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Expected to require any cardiac surgery, including surgery for coronary artery disease (CAD) or valve disease within one (1) year
  • Chronic, severe, medical conditions or pathology, other than heart failure, that will prevent likely survival beyond twelve (12) months or any other medical condition that, in the judgement of the Investigator or Central Review Committee, makes the patient a poor candidate for this study
  • An entire list of eligibility is available in the clinical investigational plan

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 75 centers
  • Dignity Health Research Institute at Mercy Gilbert and Chandler Regional Medical Centers — Gilbert
  • Banner Health - Phoenix — Phoenix
  • AZ Heart Rhythm — Phoenix
  • Tucson Medical Center Health — Tucson
  • Banner University Tuscon — Tucson
  • Memorial Care Hospital — Long Beach
  • Keck School of Medicine of USC — Los Angeles
  • UCLA Medical Center — Los Angeles
  • … and 67 more centers
France · 5 centers
  • Pole Sante Republique — Clermont-Ferrand
  • … and 4 more centers
Canada · 4 centers
  • University of Alberta — Edmonton
  • St Boniface Hospital - University of Manitoba — Winnipeg
  • Toronto General Hospital — Toronto
  • Unity Health Toronto, St Michael's Hospital — Toronto
Spain · 3 centers

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Italy · 2 centers

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Greece · 1 center

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Poland · 1 center

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

United Kingdom · 1 center

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Schofer J, Siminiak T, Haude M, Herrman JP, Vainer J, Wu JC, Levy WC, Mauri L, Feldman T, Kwong RY, Kaye DM, Duffy SJ, Tubler T, Degen H, Brandt MC, Van Bibber R, Goldberg S, Reuter DG, Hoppe UC. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation: results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study. Circulation. 2009 Jul 28;120(4):326-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULAT PMID 19597051
  • Siminiak T, Wu JC, Haude M, Hoppe UC, Sadowski J, Lipiecki J, Fajadet J, Shah AM, Feldman T, Kaye DM, Goldberg SL, Levy WC, Solomon SD, Reuter DG. Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation by percutaneous annuloplasty: results of the TITAN Trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Aug;14(8):931-8. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs076. Epub 2012 May 21. PMID 22613584
  • Lipiecki J, Siminiak T, Sievert H, Muller-Ehmsen J, Degen H, Wu JC, Schandrin C, Kalmucki P, Hofmann I, Reuter D, Goldberg SL, Haude M. Coronary sinus-based percutaneous annuloplasty as treatment for functional mitral regurgitation: the TITAN II trial. Open Heart. 2016 Jul 8;3(2):e000411. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000411. eCollection 2016. PMID 27493761

Identifiers

NCT: NCT03142152 · CVP 1670-01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗