Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT02939664

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Banded Gastric Bypass Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

No phase Interventional Morbid Obesity Weight Loss Postoperative Complications

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Banded (with polypropylene mesh) gastric bypass, Gastric bypass.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Morbid Obesity, Weight Loss, Postoperative Complications. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Spain
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Banded Gastric Bypass, a Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Overview

This study try to identify differences in length of operation, weight loss and complications, between two different bariatric surgical techniques, the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y banded gastric bypass. The study will be conducted in a Spanish public health system hospital. The patients of the trial will have the preoperative studies, hospital treatment during the admission, postoperative treatment and follow up as any other patient included in the hospital bariatric surgery program. The study cases will have placed around the gastric pouch a band of polypropylene mesh, and will be randomly choose between the participants. Patients will be randomized in a 5/3 (study/control) ratio.

Detailed description

One group of patients of the study will have done the simplified laparoscopic gastric bypass, with a vertical gastric pouch of about 20 ml, a 150 cm Roux-en-Y limb constructed in an antegastric antecolic fashion, and a biliary limb of 100 cm. Anastomosis will be done with endoscopic surgical linear stapler, closing the apertures with continuous absorbable running sutures. The Petersen space and the mesenteric defect will be closed with non-absorbable sutures.

The other group of patients will have performed the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y banded gastric bypass. This technique is identical to the one performed in the other group, but differs in that a polypropylene mesh (10x65 mm) is placed 15 mm proximal to the anastomosis around the gastric pouch, and the gastric pouch is about 15 mm longer.

The investigators randomly assigned 50 patients to the study group (Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y banded gastric bypass) and 30 to the control group (Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) , n=80, and were also blinded to the surgeon until surgery.

One of the methods is basically the same than the other, but for the placement of the polypropylene mesh around the gastric pouch above the anastomosis, and patient series with Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y banded gastric bypass showed long term better weight loss than other series with not banded gastric bypass, thus it is expected a difference in long term weight loss between groups.

Fisher Test will be used for the statistical analysis, assuming a risk of 0.05 and a statistical power of 90%.

Sample size is calculated considering bibliographic long term weight loss in both groups, which is 82% in the banded group versus 63% in the not banded group. Thus sample size (n): 67, and adjust by loss sample size: 79 (10% expected loss ratio), not being necessary a 1: 1 ratio between cases and controls and requiring no more than 25 controls, A sample size of 50 cases and 30 controls, total n = 80, will be used.

The method of randomization was concealed envelopes.

Interventions

  • Device Banded (with polypropylene mesh) gastric bypass
    The patient will be submitted to a Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y banded gastric bypass at the time of the operation, with a polypropylene mesh around the gastric pouch.
  • Procedure Gastric bypass
    In this case a simplified conventional gastric bypass will be performed

Primary outcome measures

  • Change from operation date, in excess weight loss at 10 years [Time frame: 10 years]
  • Postoperative complications at 10 years [Time frame: 10 years]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Excess weight loss at 5 years [Time frame: 5 years]
  • Total Hospital cost at 3 months [Time frame: up to 3 months]
  • Postoperative complications 1 year [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Postoperative complications 2 years [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Postoperative complications 3 years [Time frame: 3 years]
  • Postoperative complications 5 years [Time frame: 5 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • criteria for bariatric surgery published in 1991 for the National Institutes of Health of the USA.
  • Body mass index (BMI)> 40 and <55 kg/m2
  • Obesity for more than 5 years of evolution
  • Fail in medical supervised weight loss program
  • patient knowing of the mechanism of weight loss after surgery and agreement to collaborate with medical recommendations, diet, medical treatment, as well as the visit established in the follow up program
  • patient accepting that surgery objective is not to achieve the ideal weight.
  • signed specific informed consent
  • women will agree in avoid gestation during one year after surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients unable to sign the informed consent form because of a mental disorder.
  • endocrine diseases causing obesity
  • unstable mental disorder, evaluated for a psychiatry MD.
  • high anesthetic risk making surgery too risky.
  • Malignant neoplasm
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Severe liver disease
  • Digestive disease that makes unwise the bypass technique (mainly gastric illness that may required upper endoscopy for control)
  • abdominal wall hernias
  • Symptomatic biliary pathology that requires cholechistectomy at the same time of the bariatric surgery
  • any known pathology that requieres or recomend simultaneous surgery at the time of the bariatric surgery.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Spain · 1 center
  • Servicio de Cirugía General. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda — Majadahonda

Publications

  • Arceo-Olaiz R, Espana-Gomez MN, Montalvo-Hernandez J, Velazquez-Fernandez D, Pantoja JP, Herrera MF. Maximal weight loss after banded and unbanded laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Jul-Aug;4(4):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Jan 28. PMID 18226982
  • Bessler M, Daud A, Kim T, DiGiorgi M. Prospective randomized trial of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass for the super obese: early results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jul-Aug;3(4):480-4; discussion 484-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Jun 4. PMID 17544335
  • Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014 Sep;24(9):1536-51. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1311-1. PMID 25001288
  • Capella JF, Capella RF. An assessment of vertical banded gastroplasty-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Am J Surg. 2002 Feb;183(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00871-6. PMID 11918873
  • Capella JF, Capella RF. The weight reduction operation of choice: vertical banded gastroplasty or gastric bypass? Am J Surg. 1996 Jan;171(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80077-4. PMID 8554155
  • Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WR, Jennings N, Balupuri S, Small PK. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1771-92. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1346-3. PMID 24968745
  • Rasera I Jr, Coelho TH, Ravelli MN, Oliveira MR, Leite CV, Naresse LE, Henry MA. A Comparative, Prospective and Randomized Evaluation of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With and Without the Silastic Ring: A 2-Year Follow Up Preliminary Report on Weight Loss and Quality of Life. Obes Surg. 2016 Apr;26(4):762-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1851-z. PMID 26314349
  • Zarate X, Arceo-Olaiz R, Montalvo Hernandez J, Garcia-Garcia E, Pablo Pantoja J, Herrera MF. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing banded versus standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):395-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 3. PMID 23260801

Identifiers

NCT: NCT02939664 · 04252016Acta07.16

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗