Clinical Evaluation of Laryngeal Transplantation: Study of 3 Patients
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Laryngeal transplantation.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Laryngeal Transplantation. Basic parameters: 18 years — 60 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- France
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Clinical Evaluation of Laryngeal Transplantation: Pilot Study of 3 Patients
Overview
The experience of face and hand composite tissue transplantations reported in the international community have mainly concerned trauma patients. Feasibility and individual benefit have been demonstrated for these indications, in properly selected patients. The first laryngeal transplantation also concerned a case of post-traumatic reconstruction. A certain number of patients, who have suffered direct (extended period of intubation during a stay in the ICU, road traffic accident etc.) or indirect trauma (thermal or chemical burns) to the larynx, present irreversible trauma or injury to the larynx in which conventional treatments are unable to restore laryngeal function. These patients find themselves severely disabled, with a significant reduction in their quality of life. They suffer from stigmatization which leads to social isolation (professional and personal). In some circumstances, providing healthy tissue and anatomical or functional components (cartilage, muscle, nerves, blood vessels) by means of an allogeneic laryngeal transplantation, is the only way of allowing patients, whose quality of life has been seriously affected, to speak, breath and swallow normally. The extremely promising results from other international teams in this area have encouraged the investigators to present this project. The specificities of the protocol compared to previous transplantations carried out by other teams are: * The technique for nerve re-innervation which should make it possible to decannulate all patients and improve functional outcomes in the graft. * A dual therapy immunosuppressive regimen will be used, if the patient's clinical and biological status permits, which can be adjusted according to the type of tissue grafted. It might be thought that the need for immunosuppressive therapy means the indications will remain rare, representing an incidence of less than five patients a year in France. However, the interest of this research project does not reside in the number of patients concerned but rather the total lack of any existing therapeutic solution. Conducting a case series will help determine whether, under certain conditions, laryngeal transplantation can improve the management of patients for whom the usual reconstructive surgery options are unsatisfactory. The study is intended to provide a descriptive analysis of a case series of three laryngeal transplantations before and after comparisons, each patient serving as their own control.
Interventions
- Other Laryngeal transplantation
Laryngeal transplantation
Primary outcome measures
- Swallowing evaluation measured using the "Deglutition Handicap Index" [Time frame: 3 years post transplantation]
- Voice production evaluated by self-report VHI (Voice Handicap Index) patient questionnaires [Time frame: 3 years post transplantation]
- Respiration evaluated by decannulation [Time frame: 3 years post transplantation]
- Graft survival [Time frame: 3 years post transplantation]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients presenting with the permanent loss of laryngeal functions. Loss of laryngeal function is considered when a patient is permanently tracheotomized, is mutic and presented failure for each of the three conventional treatment. Conventional treatment lines are organized in the following manner firstly laser, then prosthesis and lastly surgery) Diet may be normal.
- Adults aged between 18 to 60 years;
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score < 3 and the health status of the patients must be compatible not only with the graft but also with all the treatments envisaged by the study (according investigator assessment);
- Psychological maturity: recipients should be psychologically balanced, assessed by the team psychiatrists, have taken personality tests, determined and willing, capable of understanding the information provided on the risks relating to the surgery and the immunosuppressive treatment, and capable of making their own decision regarding the transplantation. The psychological preparation for the transplantation requires relationships to be built up prior to the procedure between the patient, the team providing care for laryngectomized patients, the rehabilitation team, the surgical team and the psychiatrist;
- Patients capable of understanding the information provided on the risks relating to the study, and capable of making their own decision regarding the transplantation according investigator assessment;
- Having given written informed consent prior to any procedure related to the study;
- Covered by a Health System where applicable, and/or in compliance with the recommendations of the national laws in force relating to biomedical research.
Exclusion criteria
- Minors or patients aged over 60 years;
- Patients with a history of cancer of the upper airways or upper digestive tract; excepted:
- Patients, non-smoker, who have undergone total laryngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, in complete remission for at least 5 years \*. Remission for at least 5 years will be confirmed with imaging, endoscopy or histology.
- Patients with low-grade chondrosarcoma of the larynx, a tumor with very low metastatic potential, often classified as intermediate or even benign (complete resection with histologically confirmed healthy margins)\*
- Patients who are already receiving immunosuppressive treatment (Only patients already receiving an immunosuppressive dose equivalent to that specified in the study protocol may be considered under this criterion)
- Patients with a history of other types of malignancy;
- Patients presenting with a progressive malignant tumor; suspicious laryngeal lesions (dysplasia ...)
- Patients with addiction to alcohol and/or smoking (Consumption of alcohol in the last 5 years and/or consumption of more than 10 packs per year that has not been stopped in the last 5 years).
- Patient presenting hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV(Human Immunodeficiency Virus) infection;
- Patients with a history of psychiatric disorders: known delusional psychosis, untreated severely depressed patients, patients with severe behavioral disorders, patients with permanent generalized anxiety disorder,
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score ≥ 3;
- Patients presenting moderate renal failure which does not justify renal transplantation with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 calculated using the CKD-EPI formula;
- Arterial hypertension treated by more than one therapy;
- Testing for anti-HLA antibodies will be carried out at the initial inclusion visit, a cross-match will be carried out immediately before transplantation, a positive cross-match will be considered as an automatic contraindication to carrying out the transplantation;
- Women who are pregnant or not taking contraception (effective contraceptive method compulsory);
- Women who are breastfeeding;
- People who have been deprived of their freedom through a legal or administrative decision;
- Adult with a legal guardian;
- Patients in emergency situations;
- EBV (Epstein-Barr Virus) seronegative recipient with EBV seropositive graft, due to the risk of lymphoma.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
France · 3 centers
- Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices — Lyon
- Service ORL & Chirurgie Cervicofaciale - Hôpital Charles Nicolle - CHU Rouen — Rouen
- Centre de soins de suite et de réadaptation fonctionnelle - SSR Val Rosay — Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or
Identifiers
NCT: NCT02821299 · 69HCL14_0443 · 2016-A00767-44