Menu
Recruiting NCT02812212

CTT on Renogram as an Early Marker of Significant Obstruction in Uretero-pelvic Junction Syndrome

No phase Interventional Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ultrasonography, diuretic renography.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Basic parameters: 4 Weeks — 8 Weeks · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Cortical Transit Time on Diuretic Renogram as an Early Marker of Significant Obstruction in Antenatally Detected Uretero-pelvic Junction Syndrome

Overview

Cortical transit time on diuretic renogram as an early marker of significant obstruction in antenatally detected uretero-pelvic junction syndrome

Detailed description

Antenatal hydronephrosis (ANH) is an uropathy characterized by a dilatation of the renal collecting system. It is the most common abnormality found during prenatal ultrasound examination (1-5% pregnancies). Though the majority of cases are transient or "functional" and ultimately resolve after birth, some cases have a pathological origin of which ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is the most common (7-35% cases).

An increased understanding of the natural history of ANH has been accompanied by a change in its management from systematic surgical approach to active surveillance and selective surgery. The main challenge is then to differentiate reversible ANH from pathological UPJO. Pathological obstruction generally results in an impairment of urine flow which, if left untreated, will result in renal damage or abnormal development of the kidney. It is therefore up to the paediatric urologist to determine whether the obstruction is significant before any irreversible damage occurs. However, without reliable prognostic criteria identified to date, controversy still exists regarding the indication and optimal timing for surgical management of UPJO.

Diuretic renography is currently the most widely used diagnostic modality to evaluate renal function and obstruction. It confirms significant obstruction when it demonstrates alteration of renal function, but having to wait for significant and potentially irreversible loss of function to be able to confirm surgical indication is unsatisfactory.

For many authors increase in hydronephrosis, defined as an increase in the dilatation of antero-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD), is a marker of significant obstruction. But again, having to wait for an increase in hydronephrosis, which is by definition deterioration of the kidney, even if it precedes loss of function, remains unsatisfactory and therefore an earlier marker is needed to improve patients' management.

Determining a reliable early predictive marker for future deterioration of renal function in children with UPJO will considerably change current management of these children by avoiding unnecessary surgery for reversible cases and by being able to offer early surgery before renal deterioration for pathological cases. It could also determine which patients need close surveillance and which do not need to be monitored as often.

Two potential markers have been recently described: the cortical transit time (CTT) measured on renogram, which was shown in a recent retrospective study, to be associated with the need or not for surgery, and positional variation in APRPD as measured by sonography, which was also found to have prognostic value in a recently published pilot study. Both criteria are promising but need to be evaluated prospectively in larger population.

The investigators propose to study prospectively the prognostic value of CTT and as a secondary objective, to determine the prognostic value of positional variation in APRPD. The investigators will then be able to compare these two prognostic markers.

Interventions

  • Device ultrasonography
    bilateral ultrasonography to measure the antero-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD) in both positions.
  • Device diuretic renography
    diuretic renography to measure the cortical transit time.

Primary outcome measures

  • risk, during the first year of life, of an increase of 4mm or more in the measure of APRPD by ultrasonography as compared to the baseline measure, according to the presence or not of an abnormal cortical transit ti [Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Infants:

  • Aged of 4 to 8 weeks of life
  • Presenting an ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) detected before birth by ultrasound
  • Presenting an UPJO, defined by an Antero-Posterior Renal Pelvic Diameter greater or equal to 15 mm, confirmed by ultrasound post-natally between the 1st and 15th day of life
  • Presenting a unilateral UPJO
  • whose legal representatives have provided a signed free and informed written consent for their infant's participation
  • whose at least one of his legal representative is affiliated to national social security

Exclusion criteria

Infants presenting:

  • A bilateral UPJO
  • An ureteral dilatation
  • An associated contralateral uropathy
  • A solitary kidney
  • A renal insufficiency
  • Severe associated disabilities ( ie polymalformation syndromes)
  • A concomitant participation in another trial
  • A contraindication to furosemide (acute renal insufficiency, hepatic encephalopathy, hypovolemia or dehydration, severe hypokalemia, severe hyponatremia)
  • A contraindication to the radionuclide marker (hypersensitivity to the active substance or to excipients)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Diagnostic

Study locations

France · 5 centers
  • CHU de Bordeaux — Bordeaux
  • CHU de Limoges — Limoges
  • CHU de Nantes — Nantes
  • CHU de Rennes — Rennes
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion — Saint-Denis

Identifiers

NCT: NCT02812212 · 2015/CHU/11

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗